BY ADA DIKE
Two
weeks after the General Manager of the National Theatre, Lagos, Mr. Kabir
Yusuf, announced the final stage of National Theatre, LAgos Concession plan,
some stakeholders have alleged that he deviated from the real outcome of the
result.
This
is coming up after Yusuf had a press briefing on Tuesday, June 9, 2015 in which
he named Topwide Apeas/Chris Michael Limited as the preferred bidder and
Calzada Nigeria Limited as the reserved bidder for the concession of the fallow
land at the complex for the provision of Five Star Hotel, International
Standard Duty-Free Shopping Mall, Multi-level Car Park, Land and Water
Recreation Parks, Office Buildings and so on.
Yusuf,
according to reports said the two companies were among the three that submitted
technical and financial bids in line with the concession plan and emphasised that
the companies were selected after their technical and financial bids were
opened and evaluated by a special team, consisting of representatives of the
National Theatre and its transaction advisers, BGL Plc, under the supervision
of the official regulator of the project the Infrastructure Concession
Regulatory Committee (ICRC).
Newswatch
Times learnt that he said the result has been certified by the ICRC and the
companies have been communicated to accordingly. “The next stage of this
transaction is negotiation and the preparation of the Final Outline Business
Case (OBC) for the approval of the Federal Executive Council, after which the
project will commence,” he said.
Commenting
on the announcement of the preferred bidder and reserved bidder by the GM of
the National Theatre, Lagos, some stakeholders have accused of selecting his
own choice.
Federal
government, according to a source, is genuinely but very loosely interested in
concessioning the National Theatre, Lagos, because there were a lot of
pressures based on the fallow land around there. “That is what everyone of them
was interested in, not the theatre itself but, I am aware that those in culture
ensure that anybody that wants to get that place concessioned must ensure that
the National Theatre for what it stands for today is maintained. So in some of
the proposals they gave out that was weighed, the government appointed an
agency that is responsible for looking into such things, Infrastructure
Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) to oversee the project and the federal
government paid some money to BGL plc to do that job, to oversee the bidding
process and money was also given to the National Theatre management as well as people
in the ministry to do tour (road show),” the source explained.
The source queried why a road show should be
done abroad which gulped millions of Nigeria.
The
source further said that, at the end of the day, they called for bids and BGL
Plc did its work and passed it to the ministry and they chose the preferred
bidder. “But they have been intrigues
going on,” the source revealed.
Reacting
to the intrigues, the source said the GM of the theatre did not follow the
recommendation of BGL Plc and alleged that Yusuf took it upon himself that role
of transaction supervisor, that is why he issued a press conference and announced
the company he recommended as the preferred bidder whereas, he is supposed not
to be part of the committee.
“Anyway, he did not do anything until former
President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration ended. In fact, he wrote a letter
to Calzda Nigeria Limited saying that they were the reserved bidder, which is contrary
to the fact. That is what he is exploiting now, trying to angle himself as if
he has done the right thing. This man is on a course to sidetrack a process
that will bring change to the National Theatre itself because I have seen some
of the documents presented and the proposals of both parties shortlisted. Even
in terms of financial outlay, Calzada Nigeria Limited is 144billion naira,
whereas the other one is 103billion naira. In terms of economic and financial
perspective, in terms of experience and which company has capacity and support,
Calzada Nigeria Limited has the support of Afrexim bank.
What endeared me to the preferred bidder’s bid was the fact that they were able
to extract from them the independence of the National Theatre. The National
Theatre will still be National Theatre with investment of over 12billion naira
to renovate the place and still remain something belonging to the federal
government.
“What
they are interested in is the land to do their business, their entertainment
city. My own concern there is that the National Theatre will still come back to
us and all the things we had there before will come back but on an improved
level,” the source emphasised.
Commenting
on the National Theatre itself, concerning what it was, what it has been and
the future, a source said there was beginning to be a kind of restoration but
things started going down because they stopped the churches that were bringing
money from using the place.
“The
popular Abegi joint is the only bubbling place at the National Theatre premises
and they have turned the place to a brothel. Even, homosexuals allegedly hang
around there at night to meet their partners.”
The
source called for complete change in the National Theatre, Lagos. “The change
must be total in terms of the theatre,” he added.
Attempts
to get Kabir react to the latest development proved abortive as his phone number
was not available.
It
would be recalled that, in a bid to rebrand the theatre, the Federal Ministry
of Tourism, Culture and National Orientation on behalf of the Federal
Government of Nigeria considered the involvement of Public Private Partnership
for the turning of the national Theatre as Entertainment City. On September 20,
2012, the past Minister of the Federal Ministry of Tourism, Culture and
National Orientation, Chief Edem Duke, inaugurated a committee which included
the Federal Ministry of Land, Housing and Urban Development, Federal Ministry
of Tourism, Culture and National Orientation, Federal Ministry of Works, Office
of the Surveyor-General of the Federation, Lagos State Ministry of Physical
Planning, Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Committee (ICRC) and the National
Theatre.
After
advertisements on local and international media on “Request for Expression of
Interest (EOI) for the concession of the fallow land around the National
Theatre in line with the Master Plan (Nigeria Entertainment City)” through the
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) in accordance with the ICRC Act 2005 and
National Policy on Public Private Partnership, the National Theatre held four
(4) Investor Road Shows to shop for reputable local and international investors
in four locations in Lagos (Nigeria) on November 6, 2014, London (United
Kingdom)on November 13 and 14, 2014, Dubai (United Arab Emirate) on November 16
and 17, 2014 and Johannesburg (South Africa) on December 1 and 2, 2014.
At
a press briefing in December last year, Yusuf revealed that 11 consortia
namely; Resilient Africa Proprietary Limited, CCECC Nigeria Limited, Afrebay
U.S.A, Quippo Energy Nigeria Private Limited, Neon Holdings Consortium, Trevari
Group, Causeway Project Limited, Calzada Limited, RMB Westport and Chrismichaels
Limited/Topwide Apeas, indicated interest to participate in the Public-Private
Partnership (PPP) Project to provide Five Star Hotel, International Standard
Duty-Free Shopping Mall, Multi-level Car Park, Land and Water Recreation Parks,
Office Buildings and Facility Management.
He
emphasized that, as indicated in the advertisements, the bids were opened on
December 22, 2014, in the presence of the companies, the bids were analysed by
a team which comprised their transaction Advisers and National Theatre.
The
analysis, according to him, was observed by the regulator of the PPP
Transactions, Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC).
“From
the analysis, seven companies were prequalified. They included: CCECC Nigeria
Limited, Calzada Limited, Chrismichaels Limited, Resilient Africa, Quippo
Energy Nigeria Private Limited, RMB Westport and Neon Holdings Consortium. In
the light of above, the seven companies issued with the Request For Proposal
(RFP) in continuation of the process,” he added.
After
the bidding processes and emergence of the preferred bidder and the reserved
bidder, some stakeholders therefore, advised the federal government to look
into the outcome of bids and ensure that the real preferred bidder is selected.
No comments:
Post a Comment